-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
[WIP] DMDc #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] DMDc #10
Conversation
src/dmdc.jl
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ | |||
| using DifferentialEquations | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use OrdinaryDiffEq directly for these
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.51% 79.27% +2.75%
==========================================
Files 5 6 +1
Lines 132 193 +61
==========================================
+ Hits 101 153 +52
- Misses 31 40 +9
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
|
||
| # See fail with unknown input | ||
| sys = DMDc(X, U) | ||
| # But with a little more knowledge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh nice, good example!
|
Did you pull that example from the paper? That's a good one to keep in mind as a positive proof that added knowledge can be required for equation discovery. |
|
From the book of Kutz and Proctor. But it is also in the paper and on their homepage as a Matlab block I think. |
Needs tests and maybe callback integration