Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple quick fix for refactor issue #207

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Oct 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rayegun
Copy link
Collaborator

@rayegun rayegun commented Oct 8, 2022

@ChrisRackauckas acceptable? I'll add a check option to UMFPACK for 1.9, and figure out how I want to do this in KLU. But this should suffice for now, we can always set check = false default later once those checks are integrated upstream.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #207 (b17f725) into main (8550cf9) will increase coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #207      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.00%   64.22%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         625      629       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          400      404       +4     
  Misses        225      225              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/factorization.jl 80.00% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rayegun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rayegun commented Oct 8, 2022

Okay I'm not sure I understand how switching a test from @test_throws to a legitimate test is decreasing tcov.

E: nevermind it had to update I guess

@rayegun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rayegun commented Oct 9, 2022

What exactly do you want KLU and UMFPACK to do on a SingularException?

@rayegun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rayegun commented Oct 14, 2022

Am I good to merge this, we can solve the SingularException question in a different PR?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Yes, I want to solve the other issue with retcodes, but we need enum retcodes first SciML/SciMLBase.jl#274

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 2aae22a into main Oct 16, 2022
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the rk/fix_sparse_reuse branch October 16, 2022 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants