Correct long_name for STASH 9215 #4535
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks fine, and checks out against http://reference.metoffice.gov.uk/um/stash/_m01s09i215 Which is a perhaps little odd, because I thought the MetOffice registry info was based on metarelate, which is where the existing translation presumably comes from (and was recently updated before we broke the link in #4484 ) ? |
pp-mo
approved these changes
Jan 26, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
馃殌 Pull Request
Description
Closes #3305. The relevant lines of the UM STASHmaster metadata file read:
Consult Iris pull request check list