You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Beta testers feature requests being considered (other feature requests will be implemented in #66)
export functionality of article metadata for lists of articles in common formats (e.g., .CSV, .TXT, JSON) for meta-science/meta-research (P Isager)
display only objective/uneditable impact metrics (for meta-science research) on homepage/article page; keeping manually editable impact metrics solely on author pages for evaluation/CV purposes (P Isager)
add Altmetric page on article page (Hasselman)
add additional label to tag null results (perhaps to the right of the article type label?) (Orban de Xivry)
update peer reviewers text box example text to "e.g., Signed reviewer 1, Anonymous reviewer 2" (van't Veer: putting the suggestion in your grey text will at least make people realize they can make that distinction if they wanted to.)
edit article: allow users to add (completely open) "Other information" links (e.g., shiny app, OSF project page, etc.) (Wolf) (this is a good idea on the surface, but the tradeoff is that it further clutters/complicates an already-complicated UI... need to think more about this…)
other public entity types, in addition to replication collections; for example, in-progress data analyses, or other work in-progress type entities (KUL sep 23 meeting); yes, we can consider this in the future; relates to idea we're considering of having "unlisted articles" that would allow co-authors to curate and verify transparency/reproducibility of an article before publicly posting it! (as suggested by Balzarini in 2015).
Beta testers feature requests being considered (other feature requests will be implemented in #66)
export functionality of article metadata for lists of articles in common formats (e.g., .CSV, .TXT, JSON) for meta-science/meta-research (P Isager)
display only objective/uneditable impact metrics (for meta-science research) on homepage/article page; keeping manually editable impact metrics solely on author pages for evaluation/CV purposes (P Isager)
add Altmetric page on article page (Hasselman)
add additional label to tag null results (perhaps to the right of the article type label?) (Orban de Xivry)
update peer reviewers text box example text to "e.g., Signed reviewer 1, Anonymous reviewer 2" (van't Veer: putting the suggestion in your grey text will at least make people realize they can make that distinction if they wanted to.)
edit article: allow users to add (completely open) "Other information" links (e.g., shiny app, OSF project page, etc.) (Wolf) (this is a good idea on the surface, but the tradeoff is that it further clutters/complicates an already-complicated UI... need to think more about this…)
other public entity types, in addition to replication collections; for example, in-progress data analyses, or other work in-progress type entities (KUL sep 23 meeting); yes, we can consider this in the future; relates to idea we're considering of having "unlisted articles" that would allow co-authors to curate and verify transparency/reproducibility of an article before publicly posting it! (as suggested by Balzarini in 2015).