Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

securityonion-sostat: improve netsniff packet loss calculation #1673

Closed
dougburks opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

securityonion-sostat: improve netsniff packet loss calculation #1673

dougburks opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Projects

Comments

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor

@dougburks dougburks commented Dec 6, 2019

No description provided.

@dougburks dougburks self-assigned this Dec 6, 2019
@dougburks dougburks added this to To do in 16.04.6.4 via automation Dec 6, 2019
dougburks added a commit to Security-Onion-Solutions/securityonion-sostat that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2019
dougburks added a commit to Security-Onion-Solutions/securityonion-sostat that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2019
@dougburks dougburks moved this from To do to In progress in 16.04.6.4 Dec 6, 2019
@dougburks

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dougburks dougburks commented Dec 6, 2019

The following package is now available at ppa:securityonion/test:

securityonion-sostat - 20120722-0ubuntu0securityonion137

Please test as follows:

  • install the latest ISO image in a VM

  • add the test PPA:

sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:securityonion/test
  • install updates:
sudo soup
  • run sostat and verify that it can more quickly calculate netsniff packet loss on systems with and without packet loss:
sudo sostat
  • verify no regressions

  • anything else we missed?

Thanks in advance for your time and effort!

@dougburks dougburks moved this from In progress to In Testing in 16.04.6.4 Dec 6, 2019
@weslambert

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@weslambert weslambert commented Dec 7, 2019

Looks good from my testing, and much quicker than the previous! 👍

@dougburks dougburks moved this from In Testing to Tested in 16.04.6.4 Dec 9, 2019
@dougburks

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dougburks dougburks commented Dec 9, 2019

@dougburks dougburks closed this Dec 9, 2019
16.04.6.4 automation moved this from Tested to Done Dec 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
16.04.6.4
  
Done
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.