Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/jdk9 build fixes #212

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

nhojpatrick
Copy link

Trying out SoapUI using Java 9, found a few issues and also tidy the pom.

Signed the Contributors Agreement but not heard back after email it.

Still working on Authentication Caching Issue that was the original reason why I'm looking at SoapUI

… don't assume version used as dynamic based upon java and maven versions
move version information for plugin's used into root pom, so same version is used everywhere and no version creep could be introduced.
Java 6 requires standalone install so leave that alone apart from profile activation

Java 7 is packaged with JavaFX 2.2 and is in lib/

Java 8 is packaged with JavaFX 8 and is in lib/ext/

Also update profile activation based upon Enforcer Version Range Specification, so have 3 profiles jdk6, jdk7 and jdk8. The jdk8 profile also handles any future versions assuming Java 9 Jigsaw doesn't move JavaFX out of lib/ext/
Download Java 9 Early Access (non-jigsaw) attempt build and fix as Java 9 is packaged like Java 7
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 2, 2016

Signed the Contributors Agreement but not heard back after email it.

Hi Patrick,
We have been looking and we cannot find anyone who has received your contributors agreement. Please contact me at fredrik.svaren@smartbear.com and tell me where you sent it (or just send it to me directly).

Thank you,

Fredrik Svarén
Development Manager
SmartBear Software

@prakashmrec
Copy link
Contributor

@smartbear-fredrik the agreements are sent to SmartBear-Sweden-Admin@smartbear.com, I will forward it to you.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 3, 2016

I got the impression from my predecessor that he hadn't find it. But thank you, got it now.

@IlyaAvdeev
Copy link
Contributor

soon we will jump on JDK 11, so I guess this is not needed anymore. Thank you for efforts and sorry for late feedback.

@IlyaAvdeev IlyaAvdeev closed this Mar 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants