An open-source, serverless-native, polyglot AI agent service — knowledge chat, tools, and multi-participant conversations over one schema-driven WebSocket protocol.
smooth-operator is a serverless knowledge-assistant platform that runs on AWS Lambda — no Vespa, no Celery worker fleet, no monolith to babysit. The agent orchestration engine is Rust (smooth-operator-core); the service speaks one schema-driven WebSocket protocol that five languages — TypeScript, Go, C#/.NET, Python, and Rust — implement natively.
You get hybrid retrieval (dense + sparse + rerank), durable agent checkpoints, human-in-the-loop approvals, and multi-participant conversations (user · ai-agent · human-agent) — deployed with one command to AWS serverless or Kubernetes.
Built in the open, test-first. See
docs/ROADMAP.mdfor what works today (a lot — dual deploy, all five clients, live cross-language E2E, ingestion, ACLs, rerank, OTel) and what's queued.
Run the reference Rust service locally and drive a real agent turn. The server talks to the SmooAI LLM gateway (llm.smoo.ai) — bring a gateway key.
git clone https://github.com/SmooAI/smooth-operator && cd smooth-operator/rust
# Point at the gateway and seed two demo knowledge docs.
export SMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEY=sk-… # your llm.smoo.ai key
export SMOOTH_AGENT_SEED_KB=1 # seeds a distinctive "17-day return window" doc
cargo run -p smooai-smooth-operator-server
# → smooth-operator-server listening on ws://127.0.0.1:8787/ws (model claude-haiku-4-5)That's it — an agent backend on ws://127.0.0.1:8787/ws, with knowledge retrieval, tool-calling, and streaming. No database to provision (the reference server uses the in-memory adapter); swap in Postgres or DynamoDB when you deploy.
No key? The server still boots and answers protocol actions — only
send_message(which needs the LLM) errors cleanly untilSMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEYis set.
The 30-second quickstart above glosses one thing a fresh clone has to know: the
Rust service builds against the engine crate via a sibling path dependency.
rust/Cargo.toml points at ../../smooth-operator-core/rust/smooth-operator-core,
so you must check out smooth-operator-core
next to this repo:
~/dev/
├── smooth-operator/ # this repo
└── smooth-operator-core/ # the engine — clone it as a sibling, NOT a child
# 1. Clone both repos side by side.
git clone https://github.com/SmooAI/smooth-operator-core
git clone https://github.com/SmooAI/smooth-operator
cd smooth-operator/rust
# 2. Local-only auth + a gateway key.
export AUTH_MODE=none # dev only — boots /ws with the admin API open
export SMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEY=sk-… # your llm.smoo.ai key (talks to the real gateway)
export SMOOTH_AGENT_SEED_KB=1 # seed a demo "17-day return window" doc
# 3. Run the reference server.
cargo run -p smooai-smooth-operator-server
# → smooth-operator-server listening on ws://127.0.0.1:8787/ws (model claude-haiku-4-5)Connect any client to ws://127.0.0.1:8787/ws (note the /ws path — the server
routes the WebSocket there) and drive a turn with the TypeScript,
Go, .NET, Python, or
Rust client.
Want the full ingest → chat path? The rust/examples/dev-support
example is the showcase: point it at a GitHub repo, run dev-support ingest, then
dev-support chat to ask grounded questions about that codebase. It needs a
GITHUB_TOKEN (read scope) in addition to the gateway key — see its
README.
Where do the keys come from?
SMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEYis allm.smoo.aigateway key (hosted users get one from lom.smoo.ai; self-hosters pointSMOOAI_GATEWAY_URLat any OpenAI-compatible endpoint and use that provider's key).AUTH_MODE=noneis dev-only — it leaves/adminopen; setAUTH_MODE=jwt(orsmoo) with theAUTH_JWT_*vars before exposing the server.
Connect, start a session, send a turn, and watch tokens stream in — then await the authoritative terminal response. Here in TypeScript (@smooai/smooth-operator); the same shape exists in Go, .NET, Python, and Rust.
import { SmoothAgentClient } from '@smooai/smooth-operator';
const client = new SmoothAgentClient({ url: 'ws://127.0.0.1:8787/ws' });
await client.connect();
const session = await client.createConversationSession({ agentId, userName: 'Alice' });
// One turn. Iterate the stream; `await` the same handle for the final state.
const turn = client.sendMessage({ sessionId: session.sessionId, message: 'How long is your return window?' });
for await (const ev of turn) {
if (ev.type === 'stream_chunk') console.error(` ↳ node: ${ev.node}`); // knowledge_search, response_gen, …
if (ev.type === 'stream_token') process.stdout.write(ev.token ?? ''); // "Our return window is 17 days…"
if (ev.type === 'write_confirmation_required') {
// HITL: a tool wants to write — approve, and the resumed stream flows back into this same turn.
client.confirmToolAction({ sessionId: session.sessionId, requestId: turn.requestId, approved: true });
}
}
const final = await turn; // EventualResponse — cost, tokens, messageIdThe model autonomously calls knowledge_search, retrieves the seeded 17-day return window, and grounds its answer in it — verified live against llm.smoo.ai in rust/smooth-operator/tests/e2e_llm_smoo_ai.rs and across all five clients.
The usual open knowledge-assistant stack is stateful and container-bound: Postgres + a dedicated vector engine (Vespa) + Redis + a blob store + long-running worker fleets. That's a poor fit for stateless serverless and an awkward thing to "just deploy."
smooth-operator makes a different bet:
| Typical stateful stack | smooth-operator | |
|---|---|---|
| Compute | Long-running containers + Celery | AWS Lambda (or k8s pods — your choice) |
| Vector store | Vespa (a cluster to run) | S3 Vectors (AWS) / pgvector (k8s) — no cluster on AWS |
| Queue / workers | Redis + Celery worker fleet | Event-driven Lambda / Step Functions (AWS) or Jobs (k8s) |
| Languages | Python monolith | One protocol, 5 native clients (TS · Go · .NET · Python · Rust) |
| Agent core | In-process Python | Rust engine (smooth-operator-core) behind a stable wire protocol |
| Deploy | docker-compose / Helm | SST (one command) or Helm + ArgoCD |
What it keeps: hybrid (vector + keyword) retrieval with reranking, a clean Chat · RAG · Agents · Actions decomposition, connector-style ingestion, and the MIT, batteries-included self-host story. What it drops: Vespa, persistent Redis/MinIO, and the standing worker fleet — see docs/ARCHITECTURE.md §5.
One protocol in front; a swappable engine and storage behind it. A client never names a language, a backend, or whether the engine is embedded or remote — it only ever sees the protocol.
flowchart LR
subgraph Clients["Clients — 5 native, 1 protocol"]
TS["TypeScript"]
GO["Go"]
NET[".NET"]
PY["Python"]
RS["Rust"]
end
Clients -->|"schema-driven<br/>WebSocket protocol"| SVC
subgraph SVC["smooth-operator (service)"]
PROTO["Protocol layer<br/>(actions ↔ events)"]
RT["KnowledgeChatRuntime<br/>(a smooth-operator Workflow)"]
PROTO --> RT
end
RT -->|"Agent::run loop"| ENGINE["smooth-operator-core<br/>(Rust engine:<br/>Agent · Tool · Memory · HITL · cost)"]
ENGINE -->|"LlmProvider"| GW["llm.smoo.ai<br/>(or BYO gateway)"]
RT -->|"StorageAdapter trait"| KB["Knowledge + conversations<br/>(hybrid retrieval)"]
KB --> PG[("Postgres + pgvector<br/>(k8s)")]
KB --> DDB[("DynamoDB + S3 Vectors<br/>(AWS)")]
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant S as Service
participant A as Agent
participant K as Knowledge / Tools
participant L as LLM gateway
C->>S: send_message { sessionId, message }
S->>A: run turn (replay prior messages)
S-->>C: immediate_response (202, ack)
A->>K: knowledge_search("return window")
K-->>A: top-K snippets (the 17-day fact)
A->>L: chat completion (grounded prompt)
L-->>A: token deltas …
A-->>S: TokenDelta / PhaseStart / ToolCallComplete
S-->>C: stream_token "Our" "return" "window" …
S-->>C: stream_chunk { node: response_gen }
A-->>S: Completed { cost, tokens }
S-->>C: eventual_response (200, final)
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Connected: connect
Connected --> SessionOpen: create_session
SessionOpen --> Streaming: send_message
Streaming --> Streaming: stream_token · chunk
Streaming --> AwaitingApproval: confirm_required
AwaitingApproval --> Streaming: approve
Streaming --> AwaitingOtp: otp_required
AwaitingOtp --> Streaming: verify_otp
Streaming --> SessionOpen: eventual_response
SessionOpen --> [*]: disconnect
Full action/event tables, the AgentEvent mapping, and connection-state keys are in docs/PROTOCOL.md.
Nothing here is vibe-coded — it's verified against a real LLM gateway. Substring tests prove a reply contains the right number; an LLM-as-judge proves the agent reasoned its way there and didn't hallucinate. We run both.
flowchart TD
J["🎯 LLM-as-judge quality evals<br/>(real llm.smoo.ai, rubric-scored 1–5)"]
E["🌐 Live cross-language E2E<br/>(all 5 clients drive real agent turns over WebSocket)"]
C["🧪 Testcontainers conformance<br/>(pgvector + DynamoDB-Local, same suite both backends)"]
U["⚡ Unit tests<br/>(pure logic: chunker, SSRF guard, parsers, can_access matrix)"]
J --> E --> C --> U
| Layer | Tests |
|---|---|
Engine (smooth-operator-core) |
408 |
| Service — Rust | 126 |
| Client — TypeScript | 16 |
| Client — Go | 26 |
| Client — .NET | 27 |
| Client — Python | 26 |
The headline isn't the count — it's a real defect a substring test would have missed. On the first live run, our LLM-as-judge scored a multi-turn answer 1/5: the runtime built a fresh agent per turn, so turn 2 had no memory of turn 1's delivery date and couldn't compute the last return day. A contains("the 22nd") assertion would have stayed green on a hallucinated guess. The judge caught it; the fix wired per-session memory; it now scores 5/5.
That's the whole bet: quality regressions that only a grader can see, caught in CI. Details — the five scenarios, the rubric, the same-model-judge knob — in docs/EVALS.md.
Live tests need a gateway key. They are gated, not deleted: with SMOOTH_AGENT_E2E=1 + SMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEY they run (and print every per-scenario score under --nocapture); without them they print an explicit skip and return — so credential-free cargo test and CI stay green, and the nightly job runs the full live suite. The gateway key is read from the environment and never printed.
# Unit + conformance — no creds, runs everywhere
cd rust && cargo test
# + live LLM-as-judge evals
export SMOOAI_GATEWAY_KEY=sk-… SMOOTH_AGENT_E2E=1
cargo test -p smooai-smooth-operator-evals --test llm_judge -- --nocapture --test-threads=1Two first-class paths from one codebase. The StorageAdapter seam is what makes the same agent code run on either — application code never names a backend.
flowchart TB
CODE["smooth-operator<br/>(one codebase)"]
CODE --> SST
CODE --> K8S
subgraph SST["AWS serverless — default"]
AGW["API Gateway<br/>WebSocket"] --> LAM["Rust Lambda"]
LAM --> DDB[("DynamoDB")]
LAM --> S3V[("S3 Vectors")]
end
subgraph K8S["Kubernetes — self-host"]
ING["WS Ingress"] --> POD["Deployment / pods"]
POD --> PG[("Postgres + pgvector")]
end
# AWS serverless (SST) — API GW WebSocket + Rust Lambda + DynamoDB + S3 Vectors
cd deploy/sst && pnpm install && npx sst deploy --stage prod
# Kubernetes (Helm + ArgoCD) — service + WS ingress, external pgvector Postgres
helm install smooth-operator deploy/k8s --set image.tag=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)Both paths are CI-verified (SST: synth + 47 workspace tests + tsc; k8s: helm lint/template + kubectl dry-run). Full matrix and the shared SmooAI/deploy package in docs/DEPLOY.md.
A recurring principle across the whole stack: same code, two postures.
| Capability | Smoo-powered (hosted) | Bring-your-own (self-host) |
|---|---|---|
| LLM gateway | llm.smoo.ai |
any OpenAI-compatible endpoint |
| Embeddings | gateway (text-embedding-3-small) |
DeterministicEmbedder or your provider |
| Web search | Smoo provider | Brave / Bing / Tavily via WebSearchProvider |
| Identity / RBAC | Smoo identity | SST OpenAuth (OIDC/OAuth/SAML) |
| Connectors | managed GitHub/Slack apps | your tokens, same Connector trait |
Self-host brings their own; hosted wires Smoo's apps. The seams are identical — see docs/INGESTION.md, docs/TOOLS.md, and docs/STORAGE.md.
| Repo | What it is |
|---|---|
smooth-operator-core |
The agent engine — Agent, Workflow, Tool, CheckpointStore, LlmProvider, Memory, KnowledgeBase. Crate smooai-smooth-operator-core. 408 tests. |
smooth-operator (this repo) |
The service — conversations, knowledge ingestion + retrieval, the tool catalog, the WebSocket protocol, the five clients, and the AWS/k8s deploy paths. |
smooth-operator/
├── spec/ # The language-neutral wire protocol (JSON Schema) — source of truth for all clients
├── rust/ # Reference service (flagship crate smooai-smooth-operator) + adapters, server, lambda, evals, ingestion
├── typescript/ # @smooai/smooth-operator — Lambda-native client (the smooai monorepo dogfoods this)
├── go/ # github.com/SmooAI/smooth-operator/go — protocol.Client
├── dotnet/ # SmooAI.SmoothOperator — client + the Microsoft.Extensions.AI IChatClient facade
├── python/ # smooth-operator (import smooth_operator) — async client
├── adapters/ # Storage adapters: postgres (pgvector) and dynamodb (S3 Vectors)
├── deploy/
│ ├── sst/ # AWS serverless (API GW WebSocket + Lambda + DynamoDB + S3 Vectors)
│ └── k8s/ # Helm chart + ArgoCD (Postgres + pgvector)
└── docs/ # Architecture, protocol, storage, evals, ingestion, access-control, observability, deploy, roadmap
Don't want to operate it yourself? lom.smoo.ai runs smooth-operator as a managed, multi-tenant service.
| Doc | What |
|---|---|
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md |
System design, the agent pipeline, how it consumes the engine |
docs/PROTOCOL.md |
The schema-driven WebSocket protocol |
docs/STORAGE.md |
The StorageAdapter trait; Postgres and DynamoDB/S3 Vectors designs |
docs/EVALS.md |
The LLM-as-judge quality harness (the 1/5 → 5/5 story) |
docs/INGESTION.md |
Connectors, chunking, the embedder seam |
docs/TOOLS.md |
The built-in tool catalog + authoring your own |
docs/ACCESS-CONTROL.md |
Document-level ACLs over org isolation |
docs/OBSERVABILITY.md |
OpenTelemetry gen_ai.* tracing |
docs/DEPLOY.md |
Dual SST / k8s deploy + the shared SmooAI/deploy package |
docs/ROADMAP.md |
Phased build plan + current status |
MIT © 2026 Smoo AI