SoftEtherVPN - WireGuard integration. Possible?

[vampywiz17]

See the article.

https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2

It is posssible? (like OpenVPN, SSTP, etc...)

[chipitsine]

@vampywiz17 feel free to send PR

[vampywiz17]

I found this: https://www.wireguard.com/xplatform/#cross-platform-userspace-implementation

[chipitsine]

that's great. are you going to implement it ?

[BlackHoleFox]

I don't think this could work at the moment, as Wireguard has not a trace of Windows support as of writing this. You couldn't run a server or client on Windows.

[vampywiz17]

@BlackHoleFox

Sure? :)

https://tunsafe.com/

[paulmenzel]

On 08/03/18 13:25, vampywiz17 wrote: See the article. https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2 It is posssible? (like OpenVPN, etc...)

Everything is possible with enough work. But could you please give a motivation, why it would be useful to have this integrated in SoftEtherVPN (Server, Client, …)?

[chipitsine]

it is not clear about motivation behind such tickets.

looks like "guys, I did the most difficult part, I googled for you ... here are links, now it is your turn"

[paulmenzel]

On 08/08/18 12:09, Ilya Shipitsin wrote: it is not clear about motivation behind such tickets. looks like "guys, I did the most difficult part, I googled for you ... here are links, now it is your turn"

Sorry, I disagree. Unless SoftEther VPN doesn’t want to have feature requests, and doesn’t have a dedicated mailing list, issues are the way to communicate. Only allowing issues, where the reporters will also send a merge/pull request is not useful in my opinion. But of course, issues, which are feature requests and are not fitting in the scope of SoftEther VPN should be closed with a short explanation.

[chipitsine]

project scope is "multiprotocol vpn implementation"
in order to implement wireguard (which I like very much) someone has to write code, tests, so on...

if nobody is interested in writing such code, issue is not very usefull.

I would not limit issue to "PR only". I would say that feature request should come with understanding of "who will write the code".

[BlackHoleFox]

According to the official site, there are none, and advise against using third party ones.

[chipitsine]

SE VPN is 3rd party from that point of view

[Corsten56]

+1 to request, just subscribing.