Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added armv5tel for debian/rules and made pushed routes work correct with OpenVPN #128

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 27, 2016

Conversation

@dglushenok
Copy link
Contributor

dglushenok commented Jan 22, 2015

Armv5tel is for building Debian package on SheevaPlug.
Also, static routes not working properly with OpenVPN as gateway address gets replaced by vpn_gateway. So, you cannot direct all traffic to VPN and make some nets to go through net_gateway.
By the way, even with this fix you have to specify IP address as gateway in config file and cannot use openvpn's vpn_gateway and net_gateway keywords.

@dglushenok dglushenok changed the title Added armv5tel machine type Added armv5tel for debian/rules and made pushed routes work correct with OpenVPN Jan 23, 2015
@dnobori
Copy link
Member

dnobori commented Sep 6, 2015

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?

@dglushenok
Copy link
Contributor Author

dglushenok commented Sep 8, 2015

Hi,

Option 1.

Дмитрий Глушенок

6 сент. 2015 г., в 3:59, Daiyuu Nobori notifications@github.com написал(а):

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@paskal
Copy link
Contributor

paskal commented Nov 27, 2016

@dglushenok, after latest merges there are conflicts, could you please fix your patch?

@dnobori dnobori merged commit 8ffb223 into SoftEtherVPN:master Nov 27, 2016
@dnobori dnobori mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2016
@dnobori
Copy link
Member

dnobori commented Nov 27, 2016

Thank you so much for your contribution to enrich the SoftEther VPN source code.

Your patch has been merged on the main source-tree of SoftEther VPN.

As a token of our gratitude, your GitHub username has been added on the AUTHORS.TXT file and on the header of the related source file.
Please see: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/blob/master/AUTHORS.TXT

Thanks again for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.