cppcheck issues #229

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Nov 27, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@chipitsine
Contributor

chipitsine commented Apr 29, 2016

[src/Cedar/Admin.c:11843] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:11845]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12316] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12318]: (warning) Either the condition 'a==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: a.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12576] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12578]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12790] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12792]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.

chipitsine added some commits Apr 29, 2016

cppcheck issues:
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:11843] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:11845]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12316] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12318]: (warning) Either the condition 'a==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: a.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12576] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12578]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.
[src/Cedar/Admin.c:12790] -> [src/Cedar/Admin.c:12792]: (warning) Either the condition 't==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: t.
cppcheck issues:
[src/Cedar/WebUI.c:1728] -> [src/Cedar/WebUI.c:1730]: (warning) Either the condition 'buf==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: buf.
[src/Mayaqua/FileIO.c:383] -> [src/Mayaqua/FileIO.c:386]: (warning) Either the condition 'p==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: p.
[src/Mayaqua/TcpIp.c:1837] -> [src/Mayaqua/TcpIp.c:1839]: (warning) Either the condition 'tcp!=0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: tcp.
cppcheck issues:
[src/Cedar/Virtual.c:2389] -> [src/Cedar/Virtual.c:2398]: (warning) Either the condition 'a==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: a.
[src/Cedar/Virtual.c:4000] -> [src/Cedar/Virtual.c:4004]: (warning) Either the condition 'n==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: n.
[src/Cedar/Virtual.c:4203] -> [src/Cedar/Virtual.c:4207]: (warning) Either the condition 'n==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: n.
cppcheck issues:
[src/Cedar/SM.c:875] -> [src/Cedar/SM.c:882]: (warning) Either the condition 'd==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: d.
[src/Cedar/UdpAccel.c:119] -> [src/Cedar/UdpAccel.c:123]: (warning) Either the condition 'a==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: a.
cppcheck issue:
[src/Cedar/Connection.c:1041] -> [src/Cedar/Connection.c:1043]: (warning) Either the condition 's!=0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: s.
cppcheck issues:
[src/Cedar/Client.c:2184] -> [src/Cedar/Client.c:2187]: (warning) Either the condition 'rpc==0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: rpc.
[src/Cedar/Client.c:6032] -> [src/Cedar/Client.c:6035]: (warning) Either the condition 'ret!=0' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: ret.
@dnobori

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dnobori

dnobori May 26, 2016

Member

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?

Member

dnobori commented May 26, 2016

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?

@chipitsine

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chipitsine

chipitsine May 26, 2016

Contributor

one

Contributor

chipitsine commented May 26, 2016

one

@chipitsine

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chipitsine

chipitsine Jul 24, 2016

Contributor

any update ?

Contributor

chipitsine commented Jul 24, 2016

any update ?

@chipitsine

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chipitsine

chipitsine Aug 6, 2016

Contributor

knock-knock?

Contributor

chipitsine commented Aug 6, 2016

knock-knock?

@chipitsine chipitsine referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2016

Closed

Is this project DEAD? #268

@dnobori dnobori merged commit 5cae447 into SoftEtherVPN:master Nov 27, 2016

@dnobori

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dnobori

dnobori Nov 27, 2016

Member

Thank you so much for your contribution to enrich the SoftEther VPN source code.

Your patch has been merged on the main source-tree of SoftEther VPN.

As a token of our gratitude, your GitHub username has been added on the AUTHORS.TXT file and on the header of the related source file.
Please see: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/blob/master/AUTHORS.TXT

Thanks again for your contribution.

Member

dnobori commented Nov 27, 2016

Thank you so much for your contribution to enrich the SoftEther VPN source code.

Your patch has been merged on the main source-tree of SoftEther VPN.

As a token of our gratitude, your GitHub username has been added on the AUTHORS.TXT file and on the header of the related source file.
Please see: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/blob/master/AUTHORS.TXT

Thanks again for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment