-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Examples and a new project dialog. #28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new graphical example script ( Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NewProjectDialog (UI)
participant JFileChooser
User->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Open dialog
User->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Enter project info (name, author, location)
User->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Click "Select" for location
NewProjectDialog (UI)->>JFileChooser: Open directory chooser
JFileChooser-->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Return selected directory
User->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Click "Finish"
NewProjectDialog (UI)->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Validate inputs
alt Validation fails
NewProjectDialog (UI)->>User: Show error labels
else Validation succeeds
NewProjectDialog (UI)->>User: (No further action implemented)
end
User->>NewProjectDialog (UI): Click "Cancel"
NewProjectDialog (UI)->>User: Close dialog
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15–20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.java (4)
3-8: Remove unused imports.Several imports are not used in the implementation:
FileWriter,IOException, andLogger.-import java.io.FileWriter; -import java.io.IOException; -import java.util.logging.Level; -import java.util.logging.Logger;
69-69: Consider dynamic positioning instead of hard-coded coordinates.The fixed location
(400, 400)may not work well on all screen sizes and resolutions.-setLocation(new java.awt.Point(400, 400)); +setLocationRelativeTo(null); // Center on screen
351-351: Remove unused field.The
hasErrorfield is declared but never meaningfully used in the validation logic.-private boolean hasError;
227-227: Implement Help button functionality.The Help button currently has no action handler or functionality.
Would you like me to generate a basic help dialog implementation for this button?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
examples/starrect.pics(1 hunks)piccode/render/context.pics(1 hunks)src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.form(1 hunks)src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: hexaredecimal
PR: Glimmr-Lang/PicassoCode#26
File: tests/test_readme_validation.py:233-236
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T23:34:19.770Z
Learning: The PicassoCode project README has specific formatting requirements including: app icon at "./src/main/resources/applogo/appicon.png" with 40% width, repository URL "gitgithub.com:hexaredecimal/Piccode.git", JAR file "Piccode-1.0-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar", and elaborate ASCII art with "Creativity + Logic + Math" tagline in the license section.
🔇 Additional comments (11)
piccode/render/context.pics (2)
2-13: LGTM! Well-structured documentation added.The module and function documentation follows a clear, consistent format with proper parameter and return value descriptions. The documentation accurately describes the
getContextfunction's purpose and return value.
15-27: LGTM! Comprehensive function documentation.The
drawLinefunction documentation is thorough and clearly describes all parameters and the return value. The format is consistent with the module documentation style.examples/starrect.pics (4)
1-4: LGTM! Clean imports and module structure.The imports are appropriate and follow the expected module naming conventions.
6-11: LGTM! Well-implemented star drawing function.The
drawStarfunction correctly implements intersecting lines to form a star shape, with proper use of the optional padding parameter and function chaining.
20-29: LGTM! Depth and background line functions are correct.Both
drawDepthanddrawBackLinesfunctions properly implement their intended drawing logic with appropriate coordinate calculations.
31-39: LGTM! Main function demonstrates proper usage.The main function correctly obtains the rendering context and chains the drawing functions in a logical sequence to create a composite image.
src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.java (2)
27-33: LGTM! Constructor properly initializes the dialog.The constructor correctly initializes components and sets appropriate dialog properties.
294-303: LGTM! File selection logic is correctly implemented.The directory chooser is properly configured for directories only, and the selected path is correctly updated in the text field.
src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.form (3)
1-26: LGTM! Form configuration is appropriate.The form properties correctly configure the dialog as non-resizable, always on top, and with proper close operation. The NetBeans form settings are standard and appropriate.
332-334: LGTM! Event handlers are properly configured.The event handlers for the Select, Finish, and Cancel buttons correctly map to the corresponding methods in the Java class.
235-252: LGTM! Error labels are properly configured.The error labels are correctly styled in red and initially disabled, matching the validation behavior implemented in the Java class.
| drawRect :: (ctx, x, y, w, h) = | ||
| ctx | ||
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x + w, y) | ||
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y + h, x + w, y + h) | ||
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x, y + w) | ||
| |> Render::drawLine(x + w, y, x + w, y + h) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the rectangle drawing bug.
There's an error in Line 17 where y + w should be y + h for drawing the left vertical line of the rectangle.
- |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x, y + w)
+ |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x, y + h)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| drawRect :: (ctx, x, y, w, h) = | |
| ctx | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x + w, y) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y + h, x + w, y + h) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x, y + w) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x + w, y, x + w, y + h) | |
| drawRect :: (ctx, x, y, w, h) = | |
| ctx | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x + w, y) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y + h, x + w, y + h) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x, y, x, y + h) | |
| |> Render::drawLine(x + w, y, x + w, y + h) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In examples/starrect.pics around lines 13 to 18, the rectangle drawing function
uses y + w instead of y + h on line 17, causing the left vertical line to be
drawn incorrectly. Change y + w to y + h in the call to Render::drawLine on line
17 to correctly draw the left vertical edge of the rectangle.
| private void jButtonFinishActionPerformed(java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {//GEN-FIRST:event_jButtonFinishActionPerformed | ||
| if (jTextFieldProjectName.getText().isEmpty()) { | ||
| jLabelProjectNameError.setEnabled(true); | ||
| return; | ||
| } else { | ||
| jLabelProjectNameError.setEnabled(false); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (jTextFieldProjectAuthor.getText().isEmpty()) { | ||
| jLabelProjectAuthorError.setEnabled(true); | ||
| return; | ||
| } else { | ||
| jLabelProjectAuthorError.setEnabled(false); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if(jTextFieldProjectLocation.getText().isEmpty()) { | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setEnabled(true); | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setText("Invalid project location"); | ||
| } else { | ||
|
|
||
| if (selectedFile != null && selectedFile.exists() == false) { | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setEnabled(true); | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setText("Selected directory does not exist"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } else if (selectedFile == null) { | ||
| File tmp = new File(jTextFieldProjectLocation.getText()); | ||
| if(tmp.exists() == false) { | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setEnabled(true); | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setText("Selected directory does not exist"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| // continue by disableing the errors | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setText("Invalid project location"); | ||
| jLabelProjectLocationError.setEnabled(false); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String projectName = jTextFieldProjectName.getText(); | ||
| String projectAuthor = jTextFieldProjectAuthor.getText(); | ||
| String projectPath = jTextFieldProjectLocation.getText(); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| }//GEN-LAST:event_jButtonFinishActionPerformed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve validation logic and add project creation implementation.
The validation logic works but could be simplified. More importantly, the method collects validated inputs but doesn't implement the actual project creation functionality.
Consider refactoring the validation logic:
+private boolean validateInputs() {
+ boolean hasErrors = false;
+
+ if (jTextFieldProjectName.getText().trim().isEmpty()) {
+ jLabelProjectNameError.setEnabled(true);
+ hasErrors = true;
+ } else {
+ jLabelProjectNameError.setEnabled(false);
+ }
+
+ // Similar pattern for other fields...
+ return !hasErrors;
+}Also, implement the actual project creation logic after successful validation.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/org/editor/dialogs/NewProjectDialog.java around lines 305 to
349, simplify the validation logic by consolidating checks for empty fields and
directory existence into clearer, less nested conditions. After all validations
pass, implement the project creation logic using the collected projectName,
projectAuthor, and projectPath variables to initialize and save the new project.
Ensure error labels are properly enabled or disabled based on validation results
before proceeding with creation.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation