New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find unused step definitions in SpecFlow 3+ #1682
Comments
Hi, I'm also interested in this. From all the reports related features that Please considering adding this feature back for SpecFlow 3 and .NET Core Thanks, |
If anyone wants to take on this request, here's the link to the repo containing the old code: (It's also linked from the Reporting page in the documentation) |
I see the step definition report source code was copied over to SpecFlow.Reports. Has anyone done any testing for this? Is it semi-functional? Just curious to know what the current state of this is. |
Same issue, folks. |
To make it easier for you all to vote on feature requests and influence our prioritization of them in our backlog, we created in our new support tool a special forum to have a better overview of all of them. We moved this feature request there and you can find it here. Sadly we could not take over the existing votes. So if you are still interested in this feature request, please vote again on the new list. |
Update: We are happy to announce that SpecFlow+ LivingDoc now supports displaying unused step definitions. You need to install or update to the latest SpecFlow.Plus.LivingDoc.CLI NuGet package (as of writing: 3.5.186). Further read: |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
SpecFlow Version:
Issue Description
Before SpecFlow 3, you could generate a report to find unused step definitions (see Reporting and the original resolved issue #307). However, this isn't possible anymore due to
specflow.exe
being deprecated. It'd be nice if an alternative could be created for this, so we can cleanup old forgotten step definitions. Thanks!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: