Add read_neuroscope to __all__ for extractors#4064
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
So now we just have formatting errors in the docs (+like 80 warnings). @chrishalcrow maybe we should think about hitting the 12 FormattingErrors for functions as a post-docathon project. |
chrishalcrow
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We weren't granting access to the convenience function
read_neuroscopewhich was causing errors in the documentation that we were skipping over. It is one of the edge cases that we missed in my recent PR. Mainly I'm testing this via the docs which should lose the error (good thing they only take 2 minutes now :) )