Permalink
Browse files

add links from SEPs to corresponding Issues

  • Loading branch information...
jamesscottbrown committed Jun 24, 2018
1 parent 9bc7131 commit 035de741821648d16714c239ad64e03eef3f6cc3
Showing with 17 additions and 0 deletions.
  1. +3 −0 SEPs/SEP_V001.md
  2. +2 −0 SEPs/SEP_V002.md
  3. +2 −0 SEPs/SEP_V003.md
  4. +2 −0 SEPs/SEP_V004.md
  5. +2 −0 SEPs/SEP_V005.md
  6. +1 −0 SEPs/SEP_V006.md
  7. +2 −0 SEPs/SEP_V007.md
  8. +1 −0 SEPs/SEP_V008.md
  9. +1 −0 SEPs/SEP_V009.md
  10. +1 −0 SEPs/SEP_V010.md
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 01-Jul-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 03-Sep-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#4](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/4) |
## Abstract
Glyphs need some additional information about how they are to be used, as failing to specify this has caused confusion. In particular:
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 21-Jul-2017 |
| **Last modified** | <leave empty if this is the first submission> |
| **Issue** | [#5](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/5) |
## Abstract
Sometimes there is more than one way of drawing a diagram that is accepted by the community and no strong reason to attempt to force a choice of only one. In such cases, SBOL Visual should recommend one symbol, but also endorse good alternatives.
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 21-Jul-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 17-Aug-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#6](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/6) |
## Abstract
We need a way of distinguishing between three distinct use cases that are currently all covered by the "User Defined" symbol. These are:
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 22-Aug-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 18-Sep-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#8](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/8) |
## Abstract
A number of new glyphs have been proposed over the past few years, and we need to put them to an up-or-down vote.
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 30-Aug-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 17-Sep-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#9](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/9) |
## Abstract
A number of potential variants of existing glyphs have been proposed, and we need to put them to an up-or-down vote. We also need to clarify the position and/or interior of some of the existing glyphs.
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 14-Sep-2017 |
| **Last modified** | Never |
| **Issue** | [#11](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/11) |
## Abstract
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 17-Sep-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 12-Nov-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#12](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/12) |
## Abstract
This SEP proposes a systematic set of "stem-top" glyphs representing small sites affecting DNA, RNA, or protein. The glyphs in this system are Biopolymer Location, Stability Element, and Cleavage Site.
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 25-Sep-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 26-Sep-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#13](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/13) |
## Abstract
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 7-Oct-2017 |
| **Last modified** | Never |
| **Issue** | [#16](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/16) |
## Abstract
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
| **Status** | Draft |
| **Created** | 10-Oct-2017 |
| **Last modified** | 19-Oct-2017 |
| **Issue** | [#17](https://github.com/SynBioDex/SBOL-visual/issues/17) |
## Abstract

0 comments on commit 035de74

Please sign in to comment.