From 3f872e3ff53a2ef0fa85c9ed8da66515001b2eed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Benediktsson <mrjbq7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 08:39:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] README: adding more information about STOCHRSI.

---
 README.md | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 648dc4037..d18f7945a 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -126,7 +126,24 @@ first answer to [this question](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54082459/fat
 
 If you wonder why ``STOCHRSI`` gives you different results than you expect,
 probably you want ``STOCH`` applied to ``RSI``, which is a little different
-than the ``STOCHRSI`` which is ``STOCHF`` applied to ``RSI``.
+than the ``STOCHRSI`` which is ``STOCHF`` applied to ``RSI``:
+
+```python
+>>> import talib
+>>> import numpy
+>>> c = numpy.random.randn(100)
+
+# this is the library function
+>>> k, d = talib.STOCHRSI(c)
+
+# this produces the same result, calling STOCHF
+>>> rsi = talib.RSI(c)
+>>> k, d = talib.STOCHF(rsi, rsi, rsi)
+
+# you might want this instead, calling STOCH
+>>> rsi = talib.RSI(c)
+>>> k, d = talib.STOCH(rsi, rsi, rsi)
+```
 
 ### Dependencies