I could understand Simple not having any of these three elements, but to have two and not the third seems strange; is there a reason for it? I typically use all three when documenting encoding practices.
I cannot see any justification for having any of them in simple, unless there has been some mission creep...
I think you'd use them in encodingDesc, and Simple's approach has been (I think) largely to leave the header alone. Paul is right, though: <tag> is missing too.
That seems right to me.
From: Martin Holmes <email@example.com:firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reply-To: TEIC/TEI-Simple <email@example.com:firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 5:17 PM
To: TEIC/TEI-Simple <TEI-Simple@noreply.github.commailto:TEI-Simple@noreply.github.com>
Subject: [TEI-Simple] Why <gi> and <att> but not <val>? (#19)
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/19.
I will add these extras to the list of elements only allowed in the header
deal with #16, #17, #19, #20; rethinking list of headeronly elements …
…is done; fixed Schematron check of headeronly so that it works