Skip to content

cleanup: Use explicit 0 instead of PACKET_ID_PADDING. - #2593

Merged
iphydf merged 1 commit into
TokTok:masterfrom
iphydf:padding
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

cleanup: Use explicit 0 instead of PACKET_ID_PADDING.#2593
iphydf merged 1 commit into
TokTok:masterfrom
iphydf:padding

Conversation

@iphydf

@iphydf iphydf commented Jan 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Calling it a packet ID is a lie, and we'd rather "memzero" than memset with some named value that happens to be 0.


This change is Reviewable

Calling it a packet ID is a lie, and we'd rather "memzero" than memset
with some named value that happens to be 0.
@iphydf iphydf added this to the v0.2.19 milestone Jan 24, 2024
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6370d0f) 73.68% compared to head (a7258e4) 73.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2593      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.68%   73.60%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines       30342    30342              
==========================================
- Hits        22357    22333      -24     
- Misses       7985     8009      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JFreegman JFreegman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 1 approvals obtained

@iphydf
iphydf merged commit a7258e4 into TokTok:master Jan 24, 2024
@iphydf
iphydf deleted the padding branch January 24, 2024 17:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants