Port to the new Bunch package #8

pedersen opened this Issue Sep 24, 2012 · 3 comments


None yet

2 participants


This issue existed in Trac. The original can be viewed at http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2479

This issue existed on SourceForge. The original can be viewed at https://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tickets/63


Original Author: pedersen, Original Timestamp: 2011-03-29 02:04:12.966000

Original Body: Instead of rolling our own, we should see if we can easily drop in the new Bunch package in place our our existing Bunch object. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/bunch/1.0.0

util.Bunch is useful not only internally, but also in apps, e.g. as substitute for not yet existing model objects when rendering forms. Beefing it up a bit can not harm.

TG 2.1 is already a rc, but we can consider this for TG 2.2. We should check if jsonification works properly and whether we should better incorporate this in our codebase, because it's so small and we already have so many dependencies.


Original Author: pedersen, Original Timestamp: 2012-08-24 01:41:14.646000

Original Body: - version: 2.1.0 --> 2.1.5

  • milestone: 2.2.0 --> 2.3.0
amol- commented Apr 3, 2014

Bunch code is actually short enough that in my opinion doesn't make much sense to add an external dependency to replace it. Also last Bunch release is 3 years old, so it didn't change much over time.

@amol- amol- closed this Jul 7, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment