You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current Readme section on Functions is a bit confusing.
In 1. we get a value of x = 0.7472542331020509, but in 2. the inverse gives z = 0.6543406780096065 and claims x == z.
I find that depending on your luck (or precision), x will not always equal z:
julia>using Random; Random.seed!(42);
julia> x =rand(dist)
0.36888689965963756
julia> y =link(dist, x)
-0.5369949942509267
julia> z =invlink(dist, y)
0.36888689965963756
julia> x==z
true
julia>using Random; Random.seed!(43);
julia> x =rand(dist)
0.3885220158396991
julia> y =link(dist, x)
-0.45352911444046184
julia> z =invlink(dist, y)
0.38852201583969914
julia> x == z
false
Maybe use \approx to show x ≈ z?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current Readme section on Functions is a bit confusing.
In
1.
we get a value ofx = 0.7472542331020509
, but in2.
the inverse givesz = 0.6543406780096065
and claimsx == z
.I find that depending on your luck (or precision),
x
will not always equalz
:Maybe use
\approx
to showx ≈ z
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: