Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ Uniswap V3 Arbitrum ] USDC routing issue on the interface #7646

Open
GoldenNaim opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[ Uniswap V3 Arbitrum ] USDC routing issue on the interface #7646

GoldenNaim opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoldenNaim
Copy link

Hello,

We have a pool on Arbitrum, on Uniswap V3 : 0xc09254d1be9c3b7335021873546ba480383981d9 .
It's REUNI / USDT.

There are other pools with very low liquidity, less than $100, such as REUNI / USDC.

Because of this, your interface is unable to find the best possible route.

Let me explain :

  • If a user wishes to exchange 100 USDC for REUNI, your interface will suggest going through the very low liquidity pool, leading to a loss of 50-80%.
  • On the other hand, for any other tokens, USDC.e, USDT, etc., the interface understands that it is necessary to route through the pool with the most liquidity.

Here are two images to illustrate the problem.

Wrong routing

bad

Correct routing

good

Solution :

  • Optimize transaction routing by selecting by default the pool with the most liquidity, and/or offering several routes.

Some of our users, who wish to purchase with USDC, do not understand this recurring problem for several months.

Regards,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant