Skip to content

Conversation

@EgorkaKulikov
Copy link
Collaborator

@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov commented Aug 21, 2023

Description

Fixes # (2534)

How to test

Automated tests: standard utbot-sample pipeline for regression checks
Manual tests: two scenarios from the issue

Self-check list

  • I've set the proper labels for my PR (at least, for category and component).
  • PR title and description are clear and intelligible.
  • I've added enough comments to my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • The functionality I've repaired, changed or added is covered with automated tests.
  • Manual tests have been provided optionally.
  • The documentation for the functionality I've been working on is up-to-date.

@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov added comp-codegen Issue is related to code generator ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request labels Aug 21, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@volivan239 volivan239 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov enabled auto-merge (squash) August 21, 2023 13:36
@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov merged commit 6bcdb30 into main Aug 21, 2023
@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov deleted the egor/using_getters_and_setters branch August 21, 2023 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp-codegen Issue is related to code generator ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Field values are retrieved using reflection while public getters can be used

3 participants