Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Robot_hw_nh node handle for joints. #227

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 19, 2020

Conversation

CollinAvidano
Copy link
Contributor

Modified hardware interface to look for joints parameter under the robot_hw node handle. By doing this, removing the hardware_interface prefixed namespace and just having joints as the parameter name, I have managed to get this working well with both a combined robot hardware interface with 2 arms under the same controller manager and with a single arm as is usual.

Similar to pr #110 but does not require the addition of another param. Does modify the hardware_interface param in the controller yamls to be ur_hardware_interface. But after testing and looking at source it seems only the joints parameter references that name.

@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Jul 20, 2020

Thanks for the contribution. On a first glance I would say, this does make sense. I think, this is the proper solution for #110. @carebare47 would you agree with this solution?

Copy link
Collaborator

@fmauch fmauch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Jul 20, 2020

waiting for an answer from @carebare47 before merging

@CollinAvidano
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the contribution. On a first glance I would say, this does make sense. I think, this is the proper solution for #110. @carebare47 would you agree with this solution?

Np! And thank you to you all for writing the rest of this! Figured the least I could to was contribute a parameter change I use.

@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Aug 6, 2020

@carebare47 I am going to merge this by the end of the week and close #110 if no further comments are coming in.

@CollinAvidano
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just wanted to ask is this going to be merged?

@fmauch fmauch merged commit 64ab483 into UniversalRobots:master Aug 19, 2020
@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Aug 19, 2020

Thanks @CollinAvidano for your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants