Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify run summary. Configure flake8 on travis #53



Copy link

ericdill commented May 23, 2017

No description provided.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

ericdill commented May 23, 2017

Accidentally pushed to origin. Can ignore the travis-ci/push failure


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

parente commented May 23, 2017

Looks fine so far. Was going to ask where the summary keys are used, but you just pushed a test demonstrating.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #53 into master will increase coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #53      +/-   ##
+ Coverage   96.37%   96.62%   +0.25%     
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         248      237      -11     
- Hits          239      229      -10     
+ Misses          9        8       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
conda_mirror/ 96.58% <100%> (+0.25%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 399f580...7da81cc. Read the comment docs.

@parente parente merged commit 2cf9365 into Valassis-Digital-Media:master May 23, 2017
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
codecov/patch 100% of diff hit (target 96.37%)
codecov/project 96.62% (+0.25%) compared to 399f580
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
@ericdill ericdill deleted the ericdill:segregate-download-failures branch May 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.