Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DUMMY] 11 mig stock mts mto rule #6

Merged
merged 26 commits into from Apr 17, 2018

Conversation

umiphos
Copy link

@umiphos umiphos commented Apr 16, 2018

Do not merge this PR
This is a temporal PR while we get the original PR merged.

Original
OCA#399

florian-dacosta and others added 26 commits March 28, 2018 12:29
… procurement rules to handle the mts+mto scenario
Add explanation for finding this setting
Conforms to the latest README template: bugtracker, runbot etc.
Fixes bugtracker URL on some modules.
States OCA as maintainer, removes other contributors from the 'Maintainer' section.
…en warehouse is two/three steps delivery propagate move by mts-mto in pick/pack/out
OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex
There's a traceback when renaming warehouse code (without renaming warehouse name), as name argument is False.
OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex
This method is called from the write() method the one how support
multiple records an api.multi method.

I was making some test when I tried to activate the mto+mts option for
multiple warehouse and the next error appears: ``ValueError: Expected singleton``

In order to fix this error I only added a loop to manage the multiple
registers.
OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 16, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #6 into 11.0 will increase coverage by 0.71%.
The diff coverage is 99.13%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             11.0       #6      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.74%   95.46%   +0.71%     
==========================================
  Files          23       25       +2     
  Lines         590      705     +115     
==========================================
+ Hits          559      673     +114     
- Misses         31       32       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stock_mts_mto_rule/model/procurement_rule.py 100% <100%> (ø)
stock_mts_mto_rule/model/stock_warehouse.py 98.71% <98.71%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 089605e...486215f. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 16, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 95.461% when pulling 486215f on vauxoo-dev:11-mig-stock_mts_mto_rule into 089605e on Vauxoo:11.0.

@moylop260 moylop260 merged commit 486215f into Vauxoo:11.0 Apr 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet