Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fast Foward Gym Solo #55

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Mar 20, 2021
Merged

Fast Foward Gym Solo #55

merged 25 commits into from
Mar 20, 2021

Conversation

goobta
Copy link
Member

@goobta goobta commented Mar 13, 2021

Kinda of a huge PR, sorry for the bulk. tl;dr:

I'll also add comments in the PR as well to help explain some of my logic and reasoning.

@goobta goobta added bug Something isn't working cleanliness refactoring the code to make it more elegant labels Mar 13, 2021
@goobta goobta self-assigned this Mar 13, 2021
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 13, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 649393226

  • 92 of 92 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.04%) to 98.042%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 644305435: 0.04%
Covered Lines: 1302
Relevant Lines: 1328

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member Author

@goobta goobta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of explainatory comments. As always, lmk if there are any questions on anything :)

gym_solo/core/rewards.py Show resolved Hide resolved
gym_solo/envs/solo8v2vanilla.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@mahajanrevant mahajanrevant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just have a question but its minor so approving it


while True:
pos = float(input('Which position do you want to set all the joints to?: '))
if pos == 69.:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is up with this xD?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh that's the value to reset the robot lol. I'll open up another PR and get rid of it lmfao

@mahajanrevant
Copy link
Contributor

Why do we have solo8_mmr now?

@goobta
Copy link
Member Author

goobta commented Mar 20, 2021

We realistically only have 2 versions: ODRI's Solo and ours. Since we aren't really tracking revisions, I figured it's probably easier just to make a unified name rather than solo8_mmr_v2.3.4

@goobta goobta merged commit 3c8245d into master Mar 20, 2021
@goobta goobta deleted the goobta-normalized-obs branch March 20, 2021 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cleanliness refactoring the code to make it more elegant
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VRAM Memory Leak in env.reset() Motor Encoder Observation Has NaN Observation Space
3 participants