Skip to content

Conversation

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

This makes it more consistent with naming through the rest of the witx
specs.

This makes it more consistent with naming through the rest of the witx
specs.
@kubkon
Copy link
Contributor

kubkon commented Jan 15, 2020

Oh oops, this one is definitely co-dependent on #203. I'll change #203 after we merge this one 👍

@pchickey pchickey closed this Jan 15, 2020
@pchickey pchickey reopened this Jan 15, 2020
@pchickey
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, fat finger closed it by accident

@kubkon
Copy link
Contributor

kubkon commented Jan 15, 2020

@sunfishcode Since we've landed #203, would you mind changing lines typenames.witx#L490 and typenames.witx#L493 so that the links there now read subscription_fd_readwrite::fd instead of subscription_fd_readwrite::file_descriptor?

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member Author

This patch only applies to the ephemeral directory; the field is still named file_descriptor in the snapshot directory.

@kubkon
Copy link
Contributor

kubkon commented Jan 15, 2020

This patch only applies to the ephemeral directory; the field is still named file_descriptor in the snapshot directory.

Ahh, gotcha! I missed that one, sorry!

@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit fb73d94 into WebAssembly:master Jan 25, 2020
@sunfishcode sunfishcode deleted the field-name branch January 25, 2020 00:44
yoshuawuyts pushed a commit to yoshuawuyts/WASI that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
This makes it more consistent with naming through the rest of the witx
specs.
yoshuawuyts pushed a commit to yoshuawuyts/WASI that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
This makes it more consistent with naming through the rest of the witx
specs.
yoshuawuyts pushed a commit to yoshuawuyts/WASI that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
yoshuawuyts pushed a commit to yoshuawuyts/WASI that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
This makes it more consistent with naming through the rest of the witx
specs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants