🛤 Sign-extension operators #1178
Assignees
Comments
|
We've implemented this and it's been in Nightly for a long time, with our own test cases and the proposed spec test cases. We're just waiting for this proposal to advance before we ship. |
binji
added
Phase 4: Standardize the Feature
and removed
Phase 3: Implementation Phase
labels
|
Sign extension ops are now riding the trains in Firefox and will likely be in FF62, currently scheduled to ship September 5. |
|
Moved to WebAssembly/proposals#9. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This is a tracking issue for a post-MVP feature
It will be updated as the issue progresses.
Topic Sign-extension operators
Champion Ben Smith @binji
Status in progress
Phase standardize the feature
Linked issues
Linked repositories github.com/WebAssembly/sign-extension-ops
Details
This proposal adds five new integer instructions for sign-extending 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit values.
i32.extend8_s: extend a signed 8-bit integer to a 32-bit integeri32.extend16_s: extend a signed 16-bit integer to a 32-bit integeri64.extend8_s: extend a signed 8-bit integer to a 64-bit integeri64.extend16_s: extend a signed 16-bit integer to a 64-bit integeri64.extend32_s: extend a signed 32-bit integer to a 64-bit integerThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: