Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃洡 Garbage collection #16

binji opened this issue Oct 16, 2018 · 0 comments

馃洡 Garbage collection #16

binji opened this issue Oct 16, 2018 · 0 comments


Copy link

@binji binji commented Oct 16, 2018

This is a tracking issue for a post-MVP feature
It will be updated as the issue progresses.

Topic Garbage collection
Champion Andreas Rossberg (@rossberg-chromium)
Status In progress
Phase Feature proposal
Linked issues WebAssembly/design#985 WebAssembly/design#919 WebAssembly/design#733 WebAssembly/design#715 WebAssembly/design#484 WebAssembly/design#289 WebAssembly/design#238
Linked repositories


To realize the high-level goals of (1) integrating well with the existing Web platform and (2) supporting languages other than C++, WebAssembly needs to be able to:

  • reference DOM and other Web API objects directly from WebAssembly code;
  • call Web APIs (passing primitives or DOM/GC/Web API objects) directly from WebAssembly without calling through JavaScript; and
  • efficiently allocate and manipulate GC objects directly from WebAssembly code.

An important constraint is that, while WebAssembly should allow tight integration with the Web, it should not bake in details or Web standards dependencies that prevent execution in a
non-Web embedding. This suggests a design (called opaque reference types) that hides the details of JavaScript and WebIDL behind Web-embedding-specific builtin modules. On the other hand, WebAssembly can define a set of native GC primitives that allowed portable GC code to be written regardless of the host environment.

@WebAssembly WebAssembly locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2018
@binji binji changed the title 馃洡 Garbage collection Oct 16, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants