Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 22, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Sep 23, 2019

This is consistent with the ordering for all other instructions that
have signed and unsigned variants. This does renumber these
instructions, but no engine or toolchain has documented support for
these instructions yet, so that should be ok.

This is consistent with the ordering for all other instructions that
have signed and unsigned variants. This does renumber these
instructions, but no engine or toolchain has documented support for
these instructions yet, so that should be ok.
@tlively tlively requested review from dtig and ngzhian September 23, 2019 21:03
Copy link
Contributor

@penzn penzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@tlively tlively merged commit 7c2cfdd into master Sep 24, 2019
Honry pushed a commit to Honry/simd that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2019
This is consistent with the ordering for all other instructions that
have signed and unsigned variants. This does renumber these
instructions, but no engine or toolchain has documented support for
these instructions yet, so that should be ok.
@dtig dtig deleted the load-ext-ordering branch November 5, 2019 20:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants