Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FacileManage on different port #20

Closed
bagintz opened this issue Sep 18, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

FacileManage on different port #20

bagintz opened this issue Sep 18, 2013 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@bagintz
Copy link

@bagintz bagintz commented Sep 18, 2013

Should there be any issue running the client/server on a port other than 443 for https?

Thanks,
Bryan

@WillyXJ
Copy link
Owner

@WillyXJ WillyXJ commented Sep 18, 2013

Right now several bits of code rely on https running on port 443. So, yes, you would encounter issues if you changed it right now.

However, you could probably run your server on a non-443 port and update your client's config.inc.php to append :PORT to the FM_HOST variable. You'd have to do that manually as the client installer currently supports only 443. There is no manual workaround for your clients to run on a non-443 https port at this time though.

I've marked this issue to be fixed with 1.0-rc3.

@bagintz
Copy link
Author

@bagintz bagintz commented Sep 18, 2013

Thank you, I will try your suggestion now and see if it works. Also, what happened to the code in the repository, it shows empty now?

@bagintz
Copy link
Author

@bagintz bagintz commented Sep 18, 2013

Oh, nevermind, I can get the server to run fine on 8443, but one of my clients is on the same machine, so I will wait for rc3 to try it out.

Thanks!

@WillyXJ
Copy link
Owner

@WillyXJ WillyXJ commented Sep 30, 2013

This is resolved in 1.0-rc3.

@WillyXJ WillyXJ closed this Sep 30, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants