Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Collect Additional Image Manipulation Environment Data #131

Closed
getsource opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Collect Additional Image Manipulation Environment Data #131

getsource opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@getsource
Copy link
Member

As part of this discussion, on what hosts would support webp if it were enabled in core:
https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/C02RQBWTW/p1605269402382600

I think it'd be good if we started to collect some environment data on types of images supported, and maybe tools / libraries available on the system, to help inform media features.

Any thoughts on that, and if agreed it's a good idea, what details would be best to collect?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 13, 2020

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 13, 2020

Happy to support it on my hosting.

First things to collect are:

  • Webserver (Apache etc.)
  • PHP Version
  • GD implemented
  • Imagick implemented

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 13, 2020

Sorry, I'm out. Don't want to waste my time. Comment # 52 here is respectless.
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725

@getsource
Copy link
Member Author

Just a quick note that I still think it'd be great to collect this information so that we know what formats are supported at the system level, whether this happens primarily in the test runner, or elsewhere.

@adamsilverstein
Copy link
Member

@getsource This does feel like valuable information to collect to make more informed decisions in core about image formats. I'm not that familiar with how this project works (and haven't tested), hopefully this will add the info we need: #134

@adamsilverstein
Copy link
Member

adamsilverstein commented Feb 7, 2024

Fixed in #134. This issue can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants