Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turns off QNode caching by default and makes variable values available during construction #209
Turns off QNode caching by default and makes variable values available during construction #209
Changes from 11 commits
302af93
a347de5
5a700af
c5090c2
4ab1dab
2a96669
aee6adf
592c8de
2840a8b
601fcf0
1ea47ad
3296810
038cb80
c5e6538
a556c57
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there should be a better way of separating the kwargs meant for
QNode.func
, and the ones meant for QNode methods. Maybejacobian
should receive theQNode.func
kwargs as a separate dictionary argument?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is possible, purely because autograd will always send the function keyword arguments as keyword arguments. What would work is instead to collect the Jacobian keyword arguments within a
grad_options
dictionary.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about changing this here, but it seems out of scope. Should we mark this for a new PR?