Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update mutate.tbl_tree() to not assume dplyr:::mutate.tbl_df() exists #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 12, 2020

Conversation

@romainfrancois
Copy link
Contributor

@romainfrancois romainfrancois commented Mar 11, 2020

The current implementation of mutate.tbl_tree() uses an internal method from dplyr, i.e. dplyr:::mutate.tbl_df() which won't be present in dplyr 1.0.0

IIUC, this was about just adding the tbl_tree class to the result of calling mutate(), here is a proposed implementation.

Please consider this fix, as currently this breaks packages: genBaRcode, ggtree, LymphoSeq, nosoi, philr, tidytree, treeio, TreeSummarizedExperiment, universalmotif

@romainfrancois romainfrancois mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2020
@GuangchuangYu GuangchuangYu merged commit 2680ce4 into YuLab-SMU:master Mar 12, 2020
@GuangchuangYu
Copy link
Member

@GuangchuangYu GuangchuangYu commented Mar 12, 2020

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.