Skip to content

Some questions about training, please #197

Open
@glorioushonor

Description

@glorioushonor

I have trained the normal and implicit networks separately and tested them on the cape data set. In this process, I have some questions to ask and confirm. I sincerely hope to get your help.

  1. The ModelCheckpoint of implicit networks saved after training is in the second epoch, so the last eight epochs are invalid training. Does this reflect the data efficiency of ICON training?
  2. When testing with cape data set, I found that there was no test.txt file, so I changed test150.txt to test.txt, I am not sure if this operation is correct. I found that test150.txt contains 150 models (Easy: 50, Hard: 100), but I found the following lines in the code:
accu_outputs = accumulate(
            outputs,
            rot_num=3,
            split={
                "cape-easy": (0, 50),
                "cape-hard": (50, 100)
            },
        )

So I may have done something wrong here. How many cape models did you use for testing? Also, I would like to know how to extrapolate cape-NC from cape-easy-NC and cape-hard-NC.
3. I also used the pre-training model you provided for testing on the cape data set, and found that the results were not the same every time. I wonder whether this is normal.
4. Your pre-training model is not trained on thuman2.0, I was wondering if you could update the Benchmark (train on THuman2.0, test on CAPE), because you mentioned that testing results are better than the reported results.https://github.com/YuliangXiu/ICON/issues/183#issuecomment-1445002583

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions