Extremely large-scale acceptability judgment study investigating the syntactic distribution of clause-embedding verbs.
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
README.md fixed paper link in README Jun 29, 2017
megaattitude_v1.csv renamed data file Oct 30, 2016

README.md

The MegaAttitude dataset

Authors: Aaron Steven White and Kyle Rawlins

Contact: {aswhite,kgr}@jhu.edu

Version: 1.0

Release date: Oct 30, 2016

Overview

This data set consists of ordinal acceptability judgments for ~1000 clause-embedding verbs of English — with 50 surface-syntactic frames per verb, 5 observations per verb-frame pair. The data was collected on Amazon's Mechanical Turk using Turktools. For a detailed description of the data set, the item construction and collection methods, and discussion of how to use a data set on this scale to address questions in linguistic theory, please see the following paper:

White, A. S. & K. Rawlins. 2016. A computational model of S-selection. In M. Moroney, C-R. Little, J. Collard & D. Burgdorf (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26, 641-663. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

If you make use of this data set in a presentation or publication, we ask that you please cite this paper.

Version history

1.0: first public release, Oct 30, 2016.

Description

Column Description Values
participant anonymous integer identifier for participant that provided the response 0...728
list integer identifier for list participant was responding to 0...999
presentationorder relative position of item in list 1...50
verb clause-embedding verb found in the item see paper
frame clausal complement found in the item see paper
voice voice found in the item active, passive
response ordinal scale acceptability response 1...7
agreement how much participant agreed with other participants (see White & Rawlins, in prep) [-3.96, 2.32]
nativeenglish whether the participant reported speaking American English natively True, False
exclude whether the participant should be excluded based on native language or agreement (<=-2.5) True, False

Notes

  • Only participants for which exclude==True are included in the analysis in White & Rawlins 2016. The full exclusion procedure is laid out in a paper in preparation.
  • A javascript error produced 10 NA values for response, none of which affect the same verb-frame pair.