2 links different destination same acc name is passing, should discuss [b20e66] #1248
Comments
|
Hey David. We've talked about it in the CG today. The group seems a little divided on this issue. Not as much about example 7, which most seem to agree should pass the SC, but about the difference between passed example 4 and failed example 2. A number of people in the group seem to think the difference between the two is too small to justify one as a failure and the other as a pass. One thing that needs to be done here is to improve the examples. A lot of context is missing from the examples, making it difficult to gage. I'm not sure that fully addresses the issue, but that's where we'll start. We'll see how far that gets us. |
|
BTW, looking for someone to pick up this issue. If anyone is interested, feel free to open a pull request. |
WilcoFiers
changed the title
HelenBurge
added a commit
to HelenBurge/act-rules.github.io
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2020
I would like my addition to passed example 11 to be confirmed, as was not clear to me... Despite reading the definitions (I tried to make it less technical for others like me!) I might have over described what may seem obvious, to clarify the reason for passes/fails as per act-rules#1248
6 tasks
WilcoFiers
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2020
…66): Prepare for TF review (#1463) * #1248-updates I would like my addition to passed example 11 to be confirmed, as was not clear to me... Despite reading the definitions (I tried to make it less technical for others like me!) I might have over described what may seem obvious, to clarify the reason for passes/fails as per #1248 * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Moyen <jym@siteimprove.com> * Update links-identical-name-equivalent-purpose-b20e66.md Amended the rule "Inapplicable Example 1" from feedback * Update _rules/links-identical-name-equivalent-purpose-b20e66.md Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Moyen <jym@siteimprove.com> * Update _rules/links-identical-name-equivalent-purpose-b20e66.md Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Moyen <jym@siteimprove.com> * Update _rules/links-identical-name-equivalent-purpose-b20e66.md Co-authored-by: Wilco Fiers <WilcoFiers@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jey <jey.nandakumar@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Moyen <jym@siteimprove.com> Co-authored-by: Wilco Fiers <WilcoFiers@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2.4.4 requires description of destination. 2 identical ACCNAMES with dif destination is not sufficient description I would say... but its grey, let's discuss.
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose - Passed Example 7
https://www.davidmacd.com/auto-test-files/act-mar17/testcases/b20e66/ffd847275f8d2d4537d7f7346be39a226e33fbea.html
https://act-rules.github.io/rules/b20e66
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: