New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cache hit output #373
Cache hit output #373
Conversation
I'm not actually sure if removing awaits belongs in this PR. I also noticed there were no tests for another output - |
Seems like those fails are unrelated to code. I can take a look at the workflows themselves if people are busy |
Rebased PR to include fixed pipenv workflows. And just for consistency, shouldn't we try use the same function as actions/cache? |
Hello @dhvcc. I think it should work because the action sets the keys, that is why I consider it will be enough. |
Thanks, @brcrista @dmitry-shibanov. I wonder if there will be a release soon? I'll need this commit in a workflow, but don't want to enter commit hash. |
Hello @dhvcc. I think we'll release it on this week. |
* upstream/main: (33 commits) Fix virtual-env toolcache links Updated @actions/cache (actions#382) ci(workflow): add 'npm' cache for actions/setup-node in .github/workflows (actions#379) Cache hit output (actions#373) Add pyton-version to setup PyPy output (actions#365) Rework pipenv caching test (actions#375) Update README.md to fix setup-python version in example (actions#368) dist fix (actions#367) Cache on ghes (actions#363) Update dist Use `\n` instead of `os.EOL` Update dist Initialise pyproject.toml Build and format Remove console.log Remove unused file Reduce test matrix Parse values from poetry Release Add more tests ...
Description:
cache-hit
outputawait
s incache-restore
testsRelated issue:
closes #371. Test action run is here
Check list: