Allow to use templates for instructions #90
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TonsOfFun
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2025
Contributor
TonsOfFun
left a comment
TonsOfFun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great! ✨💖✨
This should close #82 and it's sub-issues. I'm going to go ahead and merge it.
Another issue along a similar vein that I'll put together is runtime overrides for provider, model, options, as well as instructions. That along with something like the github/scientist gem, would aid in the experimentation and evaluation process.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I’ve added support for templates in the instructions, but decided to more explicitly separate the behavior when we expect a plain string (
instructions: "Plain string") and when it’s a template (instructions: { template: "instructions_template" }). It seems that this approach gives us more clarity, doesn’t it?Additionally, we could pass locales into the template, which likely expands our capabilities.
Closes #82