Only support Ruby 2.2+ and JRuby 9.0.0.0+

[benlangfeld]

Drop attempts at support for Rubinius

[bklang]

Does JRuby 1.7 support Ruby 2.2 syntax?

[benlangfeld]

No, that is why I specified JRuby 9.0.0.0+

[emcgee]

FYI, I've seen a lot of segfault errors with Ruby 2.2.2 - celluloid/celluloid#625 (comment)

A simple reproduction was just to let ahn connect via Rayo to FS and then just idle. Eventually it would die with the error described above.

Haven't had time to dig further into it and report a bug back to ruby-lang or similar.

[JustinAiken]

Why no 2.2.0 or 2.2.1 ?

[benlangfeld]

Fixed.

[JustinAiken]

I like it! Rails 5 and Adhearsion 3, helping kill off old Rubies one travis matrix at a time!

[benlangfeld]

@emcgee I'm blocking this on #527. Hopefully that should help. I'd appreciate your feedback again once that is done.

[benlangfeld]

@emcgee The upgrade to Celluloid 0.16 is complete, and so this is now unblocked. I'd appreciate your feedback on how things look now.

[emcgee]

@benlangfeld I'll put this onto a staging server immediately that sees light usage and monitor it.

[bklang]

@emcgee Heads up that Adhearsion's develop branch is now Adhearsion 3 and contains breaking changes. If you want to test this, make sure you're using the support/2.x.x branch.

@benlangfeld Did the appropriate merge get to support/2.x.x? Is that even possible?

[benlangfeld]

No, support/2.x.x will not receive these changes, as this would require coordination with Punchblock versioning.

[emcgee]

@bklang Not a problem - saw those changes and I'll make the modifications on this side. Who am I to stand in the way of progress.

[emcgee]

@benlangfeld Follow up on this - I ran a stripped down version of our platform on this for the last 4 days on 2.2.2 with no random segfaults. Much other was broken, naturally, but calls completed as ussual with no issues. I'd consider celluloid/celluloid#625 (comment) to be closed by this.