Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No clear way to specify dead-end states #70

Closed
vkhomenko opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

No clear way to specify dead-end states #70

vkhomenko opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@vkhomenko
Copy link

@vkhomenko vkhomenko commented Mar 26, 2019

The documentation states:

If one state has no label, and no labeled edges, then there should be exactly $2^a$ edges listed, where $a$ is the number of atomic propositions. In this case, each edge corresponds to a transition, with the same order as in ltl2dstar. If a transition $t$ is the $i$-th transition of a state (starting with 0), then the label of $t$ can be deduced by interpreting $i$ as a bitset. The label is a set of atomic propositions such that the atomic proposition $j$ is in the set if the $j$-th least significant bit of $i$ is set to 1.

So it seems if one would like to specify a state with no exit arcs, the seemingly obvious code with no state label and no outgoing arcs is in fact incorrect, as 2^a arcs are necessary. So it looks like the only way to do that is to have the label [f] on the state, which is awkward for automata where only transitions carry labels.

@xblahoud xblahoud closed this in bae8308 Mar 27, 2019
adl added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2019
@adl
Copy link
Owner

@adl adl commented Mar 27, 2019

I've added a sentence mentioning states without edges explicitly.

Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants