In App Caching sucks
Here is the gist of this. I am not testing how fast the individual frameworks are. Comparing any of the frameworks to a cached page in Varnish would be completely unfair. They are all running under the worst case conditions. They are using wsgiref.simple_server and accessing high latency data. These conditions would make any framework cry.
What I really want to convey the fact that no matter how fast you get your application layer. If you are doing caching in the application it is going to be extremely slow compared to doing caching inside of a specialized caching proxy like Varnish. There is just no comparison.
The moral of the story is this. Get your client side state out of your server and into the client where it belong so you can do proper HTTP/1.1 caching.
I'll leave you with this quote from RESTful web services:
There’s an old joke. Patient: “Doctor, it hurts when I try to scale a system that keeps client state on the server!” Doctor: “Then don’t do that.” That’s the idea behind statelessness: don’t do the thing that causes the trouble.
Like I said before, do not use this to compare the frameworks to themselves because frankly that would be unfair.
These values are basically skewed by the fact that the first request have to fetch the data from Facebook