Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of should is breaking the build 🚨 #19

Closed
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

An in-range update of should is breaking the build 🚨 #19

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Nov 9, 2016

Version 11.1.1 of should just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency should
Current Version 11.1.0
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As should is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪


Status Details
  • dependency-ci Dependencies checked Details

  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build failed Details

Commits

The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • 63c9b56 Release 11.1.1
  • 5487a80 Update Readme.md
  • 28160d5 Merge branch 'master' of github.com:shouldjs/should.js
  • ba0093e Update Readme.md
  • c60e331 Update Readme.md
  • 12d9ec7 Merge pull request #120 from Awk34/patch-1
  • b2df8b8 docs(history): fix 11.0.0 language/etc

See the full diff.

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Nov 9, 2016

After pinning to 11.1.0 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant