Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Are you looking for volume / coverage or depth / substance? #152
The direction that I'm getting from Peter is that, given the choice, we'd rather see fewer (e.g. 1 or 2) but higher quality visualizations (e.g. it complements substantially the learning experience from reading the book alone or attending the class alone) than lots (e.g. 10+) of low quality visualizations (e.g. there is better material out there).
I think this is a reasonable trade-off because it (a) sets the precedent for the quality bar we and (b) enables people to use it right away, at the cost of coverage of the book.
I dunno if this is a hard criteria that can be applied blindly (e.g. perhaps there is only so much that one can do to explain a specific set of algorithms), but more of a general intuition (e.g. to the best of our knowledge, that's the current line of thinking).
On Mar 5, 2018 7:24 AM, "Madhurjya Pegu" ***@***.***> wrote: Hey @samuelgoto <https://github.com/samuelgoto>, I am trying for gsoc this year. Since I have no prior work with visualization to show and have less time to solve bugs. Can I send a proposal with design and a prototype mainly an implementation of a part of the prototype? Thanks