Permalink
Browse files

0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.7

	Remove mailing list address from "please report this as a bug"
	message in gc-common.c.  Minor edit to manual page
  • Loading branch information...
telent committed Aug 3, 2002
1 parent 1a823f1 commit 78042f29277dccae9554ac9ee3956bc7cb56dcdf
Showing with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
  1. +1 −1 doc/sbcl.1
  2. +1 −1 src/runtime/gc-common.c
  3. +1 −1 version.lisp-expr
View
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ SAVE-LISP does.
(Why doesn't SBCL support more extensions? Why drop all those nice
extensions from CMU CL when the code already exists? This is a
-frequently asked question on the mailing list. In other cases, it's a
+frequently asked question on the mailing list. In some cases, it's a
design philosophy issue: arguably SBCL has done its job by supplying a
stable FFI, and the right design decision is to move functionality
derived from that, like socket support, into separate libraries,
View
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ scavenge(lispobj *start, long n_words)
if ((scavtab[type]==scav_lose) ||
(((scavtab[type])(start,object))>1)) {
- fprintf(stderr,"warning: attempted to scavenge non-descriptor value %x at %p. If you can\nreproduce this warning, send a test case to sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net\n",
+ fprintf(stderr,"warning: attempted to scavenge non-descriptor value %x at %p. If you can\nreproduce this warning, send a bug report (see manual page for details)\n",
object,start);
}
}
View
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
;;; for internal versions, especially for internal versions off the
;;; main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.6"
+"0.7.6.gc-cleanup-branch.7"

0 comments on commit 78042f2

Please sign in to comment.