Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Context object to request templates + Refactored debugger files #22

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jan 28, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@pwbrown
Copy link
Contributor

commented Dec 28, 2016

Current version of alexa-app-server will fail with the latest in
master of “alexa-app” due to the missing context. Refer to this reference. This is in response to an issue that I found in the newest pull request merge in alexa app.

Adding Context object to request templates
Current version of alexia-app-server will fail with the latest in
master of “alexa-app” due to the missing context.  Refer to this
reference …
https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/doc
s/custom-standard-request-types-reference#request-examples
@dblock

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jan 11, 2017

@pwbrown Could you please update tests with a failure for this? I would merge the fix gladly. Thanks.

@tejashah88 tejashah88 self-assigned this Jan 28, 2017

@tejashah88 tejashah88 changed the title Adding Context object to request templates Adding Context object to request templates + Refactored debugger files Jan 28, 2017

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jan 28, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 95.706% when pulling 8d32cf5 on pwbrown:master into 0acf94a on alexa-js:master.

@dblock

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jan 28, 2017

I'm just going to merge it...

@dblock dblock merged commit 090ed96 into alexa-js:master Jan 28, 2017

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
coverage/coveralls Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 95.706%
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.