You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rectilinear, Rectilinear grid, hoeycomb support is too complicated and very difficult to print. Too many unuseful details. No contact between vertical shell and infill.
Also here very complicated for nothing if you have soluble material:
This doesn't allow to have a nice under surface.
With a soluble material the support should be treaten exactly the same as standard perimeters/infill.
Version
Last dev version
Operating system type + version
Windows
Behavior
Rectilinear, Rectilinear grid, hoeycomb support is too complicated and very difficult to print. Too many unuseful details. No contact between vertical shell and infill.
In the sample below:
file is MAZE LAMP https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2071943/#files reduced to 25%. 0.4 nozzle, 0.2 layer thickness.
The problem is that the support infill is very difficult to print as it doesnt touch the vertical shell.
Why not just do the same as an usual infill?
Here the difference between standard infill and support grid pattern:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: