Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support too complicated (at least for soluble material) #4030

Open
Martronic-SA opened this issue Jun 16, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Support too complicated (at least for soluble material) #4030

Martronic-SA opened this issue Jun 16, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@Martronic-SA
Copy link

Martronic-SA commented Jun 16, 2017

Version

Last dev version

Operating system type + version

Windows

Behavior

Rectilinear, Rectilinear grid, hoeycomb support is too complicated and very difficult to print. Too many unuseful details. No contact between vertical shell and infill.

In the sample below:
file is MAZE LAMP https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2071943/#files reduced to 25%. 0.4 nozzle, 0.2 layer thickness.
16-06-2017 08-38-56

The problem is that the support infill is very difficult to print as it doesnt touch the vertical shell.
Why not just do the same as an usual infill?

16-06-2017 08-38-56a

Here the difference between standard infill and support grid pattern:

16-06-2017 14-46-10

@Martronic-SA
Copy link
Author

Also here very complicated for nothing if you have soluble material:
29-11-2017 09-20-04
This doesn't allow to have a nice under surface.
With a soluble material the support should be treaten exactly the same as standard perimeters/infill.

@bubnikv
Copy link
Contributor

bubnikv commented Nov 29, 2017

The Prusa3D fork applies a concentric interface layer by default for the soluble material.

@Martronic-SA
Copy link
Author

Ok, interesting. Will there be a PR for that?

@lordofhyphens
Copy link
Member

lordofhyphens commented Nov 29, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants