Skip to content

Add a note about FormatTime platform dependence #908

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2018
Merged

Conversation

asherkin
Copy link
Member

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
*
* Note that available parameters depends on support from your operating system.
* In particular, ones highlighted in yellow on that page are not currently
* available on Windows and should be avoided for portable plugins.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought that "operating system" was probably more clear to users than "C standard library".

Copy link
Member

@Headline Headline left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, operating system is good, super clear

@asherkin asherkin merged commit b5320a4 into master Oct 11, 2018
asherkin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
@asherkin asherkin deleted the time-doc branch October 11, 2018 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants