Add a note about FormatTime platform dependence #908
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link. It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
asherkin
reviewed
Oct 10, 2018
| * | ||
| * Note that available parameters depends on support from your operating system. | ||
| * In particular, ones highlighted in yellow on that page are not currently | ||
| * available on Windows and should be avoided for portable plugins. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought that "operating system" was probably more clear to users than "C standard library".
psychonic
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2018
asherkin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2018
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link. It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.
It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: