Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a note about FormatTime platform dependence #908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 11, 2018

Conversation

@asherkin
Copy link
Member

asherkin commented Oct 10, 2018

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
@asherkin asherkin requested review from psychonic and Headline Oct 10, 2018
*
* Note that available parameters depends on support from your operating system.
* In particular, ones highlighted in yellow on that page are not currently
* available on Windows and should be avoided for portable plugins.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@asherkin

asherkin Oct 10, 2018

Author Member

I thought that "operating system" was probably more clear to users than "C standard library".

Copy link
Member

Headline left a comment

Yeah, operating system is good, super clear

@asherkin asherkin merged commit b5320a4 into master Oct 11, 2018
1 check passed
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
asherkin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
@asherkin asherkin deleted the time-doc branch Oct 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.