Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No heating after a minimal training with some not too bad accuracy #10

Open
ilyak93 opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@ilyak93
Copy link

ilyak93 commented Apr 15, 2021

Hi, thank you for your work.
Do you have any suggestions on this behavior ?

image

I ran the training for the classificator (without GAIN) the minimal amount of iterations just to have a snapshot of the model, same with GAIN (I've tried to use the previously pretrained model, and also without pretraining, same accuracy, no change).

The accuracy for both with and without GAIN is about 72%, although maybe it is explainable, why the result is the same (not trained enough), but isn't there should be any heating (in the meaning of the heating maps) just with 72% accuracy ?

Is this expected or anomalous behavior ?
I didn't use any pretrained models of FCN8, because I didn't find them available now, so I can look only at those results.
If it is anomalous, what can be the reason, where should I look for the problem for your opinion ?

Thank you in advance, appreciate your help.

@aminul-huq
Copy link

Hi,
I am facing the same issue here. Were you able to fix this problem in any way ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants