Skip to content
Commits on Jun 24, 2016
  1. @ikennaokpala

    Merge pull request #2482 from alphagov/pip-checker

    Content changes to Personal Independence Payment
    ikennaokpala committed on GitHub Jun 24, 2016
  2. @ikennaokpala
  3. @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate regression tests artefacts (PIP)

    This commit shows the affected/changes to regression test artefacts as a result of the Content
    
    changes from the commit before this.
    
    I have reviewed the changes to the regression test artefacts and it is as expected.
    
    Already existing unit, regression and integration tests passed, giving assurance
    that the aforementioned commit/changes have had no effect.
    ikennaokpala committed Jun 24, 2016
  4. @ikennaokpala

    Content Amendments for PIP under and at 16

    These changes are being made follow factcheck feedback.
    ikennaokpala committed Jun 24, 2016
Commits on Jun 22, 2016
  1. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala
  2. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate regression test artefacts (PIP Checker)

    This commit shows the affected/changes to regression test artefacts as a result of applying changes from
    this document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KbYzCS0Weq0t_YQpmuVebkSPP0AgObq6ZqT5RSw3p2Q/edit).
    
    I have reviewed the changes to the regression test artefacts and it is as expected.
    
    The Content updates affects these outcomes:
    
        * under_16.govspeak.erb
        * over_65.govspeak.erb
        * no_claim_for_dla.govspeak.erb
        * qualifies_for_pip_at_16.govspeak.erb
        * over_65_in_2013.govspeak.erb
        * qualifies_for_pip.govspeak.erb
    
    And also the pip_checker.govspeak.erb start template.
    
    Already existing integration tests passed, giving assurance that the aforementioned changes have had no affect to the flow.
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 16, 2016
  3. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Further updates to PIP Checker.

    These changes were made as per the update suggested in this document.
    
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KbYzCS0Weq0t_YQpmuVebkSPP0AgObq6ZqT5RSw3p2Q/edit
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 16, 2016
  4. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate checksum data files (pip-checker)

    After content changes here are the affected/changed list of files
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  5. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate regression test artefacts (pip-checker)

    As a result of the Content changes to the files listed below these regression test artefacts provide
    some insight on what has changed thus far, which is as expected.
    
    * pip_check.govspeak.erb
    * are_you_getting_dla.govspeak.erb
    * under_16.govspeak.erb
    * over_65.govspeak.erb
    * no_claim_for_dla.govspeak.erb
    * qualifies_for_pip_at_16.govspeak.erb
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  6. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content update for qualifies_for_pip_at_16.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    Updated to include the wording we use in the content /dla-disability-living-allowance-benefit and /disability-living-allowance-children/when-your-child-turns-16
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  7. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content update for no_claim_for_dla.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    ' ...is replacing ...' is the wording we use in the content /dla-disability-living-allowance-benefit and /disability-living-allowance-children/when-your-child-turns-16
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  8. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content updates for over_65.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    Removed '(you won't normally qualify for Disability Living Allowance because you're 65 or over)' because DLA is being replaced and we've told them, based on their age, what they might be entitled to.
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  9. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content update for under_16.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    Clarifies the governments position on this scenario
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  10. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content update for are_you_getting_dla.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    Clarify process for anyone checking on behalf of someone else.
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  11. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Content update for pip_check.govspeak.erb

    REASON:
    1. Added bullet to help parents checking on behalf of their child
    2. Removed bullet '* when your Disability Living Allowance may be affected', which is covered by '* if PIP affects you ...'
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  12. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate checksum data files (pip-checker)

    As a result of the renaming of the outcomes (in 669822b). these check provide some insight on what has changed thus far.
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
  13. @ikennaokpala @ikennaokpala

    Rename outcomes to relative names

        Here I have renamed the pip-checker outcomes to names that are relative to
        the content within each.
    
        These changes were requested by the content team, to make it easier to find
        files based on the file's name  via text editors and on github.
    
        The following files were renamed accordingly:
    
        * result_1.govspeak.erb to under_16.govspeak.erb
        * result_2.govspeak.erb to over_65.govspeak.erb
        * result_3.govspeak.erb to no_claim_for_dla.govspeak.erb
        * result_5.govspeak.erb to qualifies_for_pip_at_16.govspeak.erb
        * result_6.govspeak.erb to over_65_in_2013.govspeak.erb
        * result_7.govspeak.erb to qualifies_for_pip.govspeak.erb
    
        Also updates were made to the tests to reflect these changes
    ikennaokpala committed with ikennaokpala Jun 8, 2016
Commits on Jun 20, 2016
  1. @ikennaokpala

    Merge pull request #2566 from alphagov/change-translator-links

    Change translator links for marriage abroad outcomes
    ikennaokpala committed on GitHub Jun 20, 2016
  2. @ikennaokpala
  3. @ikennaokpala
  4. @ikennaokpala

    Replace list of lawyers with translator link

    This is a Content request to replace the misleading list of lawyers link that,
    
    the translated anchor tag carries.
    ikennaokpala committed Jun 2, 2016
Commits on Jun 17, 2016
  1. @ikennaokpala

    Merge pull request #2582 from alphagov/remove-hardcoded-text-brazil-ma

    Remove hardcoded fee and payment information for marriages in Brazil
    ikennaokpala committed on GitHub Jun 17, 2016
  2. @ikennaokpala
  3. @ikennaokpala

    Regenerate regression tests artefacts (Marriage abroad)

    This commit shows the affected/changes to regression test artefacts as a result of removing
    the hardcoded fees/payment information on the Brazilian marriage abroad pages.
    
    I have reviewed the changes to the regression test artefacts and it is as expected.
    
    The changes affects opposite sex and same sex outcomes where ceremony country is Brazil and user lives in third country or uk
    
    For third country the fees table appears while where the user live in the uk the fees table or payment information don't appear
    
    Already existing integration tests passed, giving assurance that the aforementioned changes have had no (interfering) affect to the flow.
    ikennaokpala committed Jun 14, 2016
  4. @ikennaokpala

    Remove hardcoded fees/payment information (Brazil)

    This commit removes hardcoded fees and payment information existing within the Brazilian marriage abroad pages.
    Some of the outcomes for Brazil display a hardcoded fee of £55. See https://www.gov.uk/marriage-abroad/y/brazil/third_country/partner_british/opposite_sex#what-you-need-to-do.
    
    This commit also includes the relocation of the link_to_consular_fees partial to the bottom area of the page.
    
    This change was made upon request from the Content team, because the hardcoded values are no longer desirable.
    
    After these changes were made, I ran the regression, unit and integration tests to possibly detect any errors or test failure would occur, none did occur.
    
    Leading me to believe that (these changes) isn't affecting/interfering other parts.
    
    Also carried out extensive visual verification on the browser.
    ikennaokpala committed Jun 14, 2016
Commits on Jun 15, 2016
  1. @leenagupte

    Merge pull request #2567 from alphagov/processing-times-france-and-te…

    …rritories
    
    Processing times france and territories
    leenagupte committed on GitHub Jun 15, 2016
  2. @leenagupte
  3. @leenagupte

    Update test artefacts for France and French territories outcomes

        Countries affected:
    
        France
        French Guiana
        French Polynesia
        Guadeloupe
        Martinique
        Mayotte
        Monaco
        New Caledonia
        Reunion
        St Pierre & Miquelon
        Wallis & Futuna Islands
    leenagupte committed Jun 2, 2016
  4. @leenagupte

    Update processing times in France and French territories outcomes

    Countries affected:
    
    France
    French Guiana
    French Polynesia
    Guadeloupe
    Martinique
    Mayotte
    Monaco
    New Caledonia
    Reunion
    St Pierre & Miquelon
    Wallis & Futuna Islands
    leenagupte committed Jun 2, 2016
  5. @leenagupte
  6. @leenagupte
  7. @floehopper

    Merge pull request #2579 from alphagov/refactor-energy-grants-calcula…

    …tor-to-new-style-flow
    
    Refactor energy-grants-calculator to new-style flow
    floehopper committed on GitHub Jun 15, 2016
  8. @floehopper

    Update regression test checksums for energy-grants-calculator

    This branch is just a refactoring and all the regression tests still pass, so
    I'm happy to update the checksums accordingly.
    
    I've also added the new calculator file to the checksums.
    floehopper committed Jun 13, 2016
  9. @floehopper

    Use parentheses to delimit string array vs curly braces

    This is more consistent with the rest of the codebase.
    floehopper committed Jun 15, 2016
  10. @floehopper

    Simplify logic in disabled_or_have_children_question? method

    If this condition is true then both of the subsequent conditions will be true,
    so this condition is redundant.
    floehopper committed Jun 15, 2016
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.