Skip to content

Update test badge in README to use GitHub Actions#2150

Merged
dsherry merged 4 commits intomainfrom
ds_change_badge
Apr 19, 2021
Merged

Update test badge in README to use GitHub Actions#2150
dsherry merged 4 commits intomainfrom
ds_change_badge

Conversation

@dsherry
Copy link
Contributor

@dsherry dsherry commented Apr 16, 2021

Updating this now that @ParthivNaresh has moved us to GH actions :)

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/adding-a-workflow-status-badge

Preview: https://github.com/alteryx/evalml/blob/ds_change_badge/README.md

I couldn't figure out a way to have the badge reflect the status of all our CI, heh. So its linked to our linux tests.

@dsherry dsherry added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement An improvement to an existing feature. labels Apr 16, 2021
@dsherry dsherry marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2021 21:18
Copy link
Contributor

@freddyaboulton freddyaboulton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great @dsherry ! I think we should only display the status for main though

README.md Outdated
[![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/alteryx/evalml/branch/main/graph/badge.svg?token=JDc0Ib7kYL)](https://codecov.io/gh/alteryx/evalml)
[![PyPI version](https://badge.fury.io/py/evalml.svg?maxAge=2592000)](https://badge.fury.io/py/evalml)
[![PyPI - Downloads](https://img.shields.io/pypi/dm/evalml.svg)](https://pypistats.org/packages/evalml)
[![GitHub Actions](https://github.com/alteryx/evalml/actions/workflows/linux_unit_tests.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/alteryx/evalml/actions/workflows/linux_unit_tests.yml)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should set ?branch=main so that it only picks up the main unit tests?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nevermind, picks up main by default!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2150 (9312823) into main (89387e3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2150   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   100.0%   100.0%           
=======================================
  Files         293      293           
  Lines       23915    23915           
=======================================
  Hits        23905    23905           
  Misses         10       10           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89387e3...9312823. Read the comment docs.

@dsherry
Copy link
Contributor Author

dsherry commented Apr 19, 2021

I'm not sure why the RTD job didn't come back green. The build did pass. Merging.

@dsherry dsherry merged commit ff3fa9b into main Apr 19, 2021
@dsherry dsherry deleted the ds_change_badge branch April 19, 2021 14:13
chukarsten added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2021
…skEngine`` #1975.

- Added optional ``engine`` argument to ``AutoMLSearch`` #1975
- Added a warning about how time series support is still in beta when a user passes in a time series problem to ``AutoMLSearch`` #2118
- Added ``NaturalLanguageNaNDataCheck`` data check #2122
- Added ValueError to ``partial_dependence`` to prevent users from computing partial dependence on columns with all NaNs #2120
- Added standard deviation of cv scores to rankings table #2154
- Fixed ``BalancedClassificationDataCVSplit``, ``BalancedClassificationDataTVSplit``, and ``BalancedClassificationSampler`` to use ``minority:majority`` ratio instead of ``majority:minority`` #2077
- Fixed bug where two-way partial dependence plots with categorical variables were not working correctly #2117
- Fixed bug where ``hyperparameters`` were not displaying properly for pipelines with a list ``component_graph`` and duplicate components #2133
- Fixed bug where ``pipeline_parameters`` argument in ``AutoMLSearch`` was not applied to pipelines passed in as ``allowed_pipelines`` #2133
- Fixed bug where ``AutoMLSearch`` was not applying custom hyperparameters to pipelines with a list ``component_graph`` and duplicate components #2133
- Removed ``hyperparameter_ranges`` from Undersampler and renamed ``balanced_ratio`` to ``sampling_ratio`` for samplers #2113
- Renamed ``TARGET_BINARY_NOT_TWO_EXAMPLES_PER_CLASS`` data check message code to ``TARGET_MULTICLASS_NOT_TWO_EXAMPLES_PER_CLASS`` #2126
- Modified one-way partial dependence plots of categorical features to display data with a bar plot #2117
- Renamed ``score`` column for ``automl.rankings`` as ``mean_cv_score`` #2135
- Fixed ``conf.py`` file #2112
- Added a sentence to the automl user guide stating that our support for time series problems is still in beta. #2118
- Fixed documentation demos #2139
- Update test badge in README to use GitHub Actions #2150
- Fixed ``test_describe_pipeline`` for ``pandas`` ``v1.2.4`` #2129
- Added a GitHub Action for building the conda package #1870 #2148
.. warning::
- Renamed ``balanced_ratio`` to ``sampling_ratio`` for the ``BalancedClassificationDataCVSplit``, ``BalancedClassificationDataTVSplit``, ``BalancedClassficationSampler``, and Undersampler #2113
- Deleted the "errors" key from automl results #1975
- Deleted the ``raise_and_save_error_callback`` and the ``log_and_save_error_callback`` #1975
- Fixed ``BalancedClassificationDataCVSplit``, ``BalancedClassificationDataTVSplit``, and ``BalancedClassificationSampler`` to use minority:majority ratio instead of majority:minority #2077
@chukarsten chukarsten mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement An improvement to an existing feature.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants